Catholic University’s lawsuit against the federal government is a matter of religious libertyBy Lawrence Morris, The Washington Post
Posted on: Thursday, May 24th, 2012
The author is a contributor to The Washington Post’s faith leader network.
The Catholic University of America has joined dozens of Catholic institutions across the country in filing suit against the U.S. government because the administration has refused to take seriously our profoundly held conviction that the mandate from the Department of Health and Human Services intrudes on our constitutionally protected religious liberty by attempting to compel us to provide surgical sterilization and contraceptives to those whom we insure.
The HHS mandate means that, except for houses of worship that qualify for an extremely narrow exemption, all employers and institutions in this country – including every Catholic college and university (there are more than 200) – must provide contraceptives, some of which bring about abortions, to all to whom they offer insurance.
At The Catholic University of America, we have the right, with very few limits, to operate our private university inspired by our faith and consistent with that faith – a freedom that is even stronger because it is rooted in the First Amendment, the first 16 words of which guard against government action that would restrict people and organizations in the free exercise of their religious beliefs. Free exercise, the founders’ term, is much broader than “freedom of worship,” which would lock the First Amendment inside the walls of a church or synagogue and leave religious institutions such as ours out in the cold.
The Obama Administration undoubtedly would agree that we have been exercising our religious beliefs in our long-standing practice of not offering contraceptives through our health plans. Their position seems to be, however, that the government’s interest in guaranteeing free contraceptives to every citizen trumps our free exercise. But the law requires a “compelling interest” for the government to override the First Amendment this way, and if the government does establish such a compelling interest, then the government must use the “least restrictive means” to accomplish it. It takes little imagination to come up with less restrictive ways of providing contraception than converting religious organizations into agents of the state (for example, it could directly fund and distribute contraceptives or provide tax credits to purchasers or providers). The government should not decide what a legitimate religious belief is and when a citizen may act on those beliefs.
We are forthright when we say this controversy is not about contraception. We believe use of artificial contraceptives is wrong. But that’s not why we have filed the lawsuit. At its core, this dispute is about liberty, because our civic health depends on the way policy gets made and how governmental power is restrained. If the administration had proposed to provide contraception directly, rather than funneling it through religious organizations, then we would simply disagree with the policy, pay our taxes and engage in the public debate. That is not the case here. The mandate violates the Constitution because it converts religious employers to servants of the state in providing drugs and services that it knows those employers oppose on religious grounds.
We cannot yield to a false choice – failing to offer health care to those we employ (which would violate our social gospel now, and the law next year) or not opening our doors to people of all faiths (which is against Christ’s teaching but is the only way to qualify for the administration’s eye-of-the-needle “religious exemption”).
Lawrence Morris is the general counsel of The Catholic University of America.Follow this link to read more.